[GHHF] Islam is incompatible with Hinduism; Stop the Hindu Holocaust: For Hindu survival, implement Two-Nation Theory or Declare Benign Dictatorship – Part 4
(NOTE: The premise of this article is to highlight the potential and immediate danger India is facing with increased Islamic rampant terrorist activities and Terrorist organizations’ plan to convert India into an Islamic country. If India has to stop the repeat of nearly ten centuries of Muslim brutal conquest, implementation of two nation theory or benign dictatorship is the need of the hour).
Links to read the Part 1, 2 and 3 are given below.
Islam vs Hinduism Monotheism VS Polytheism
“Islamic rule in India as a “colonial experiment” was “extremely violent”, and “the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves.” (Fernand Braudel: A History of Civilization)
Hindus believe in and practice polytheism, worship of variety of Gods and Goddesses. Islam embraces monotheism that believes in only one God, that is Allah. Polytheism is inherently pluralistic, humanistic, tolerant, accommodative, peaceful and equalitarian. In contract, monotheism is innately intolerant, violent, exclusive, dictatorial and non-accommodative. From the inception of Islam, its main mission is ridding of polytheism from the Arab world. This monotheistic arrogance spread the hatred across the globe.
Neither philosophically nor scientifically, are there compelling arguments in favor of monotheism, as opposed to polytheism. Indeed, as David Hume showed, there is nothing inherently absurd in polytheism. And as to the Koranic hint at the argument from design, Hume showed that all hypotheses regarding the origins of the universe were equally absurd. David Hume argued that unlike monotheism, polytheism is pluralistic in nature, unbound by doctrine, and therefore far more tolerant than monotheism, which tends to force people to believe in one faith.” He believes that polytheism is more conducive to maintaining peace and virtue in society. Its tolerance of diversity ideas and practices is readily accessible to chosen gods, encourages “activity, spirit, courage, magnanimity, love of liberty, and all the virtues which aggrandize a people.” David Hume has argued that monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism because the former stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one. In the same vein, Auguste Comteargues, “Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence” because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator.
Monotheism is not only inherently intolerant but it promotes violence and terror. We know from the Koran itself the hatred preached at all kinds of beliefs labeled “idolatry” or “polytheism.”Dictionary of Islam acknowledges that Muslim writers are “unanimous in asserting that no religious toleration was extended to the idolaters of Arabia in the time of the Prophet. The only choice given them was death or the reception of Islam.” Implicit in all kinds of monotheism is the dogmatic certainty that it alone has access to the true God, it alone has access to truth. Everyone else is not only woefully misguided but doomed to perdition and everlasting hellfire.
Arthur Schopenhauer asks us to reflect on the “cruelties to which religions, especially the Christian and Mohammedan, have given rise” and “the misery they have brought on the world.” Also think of “the bloody and terrible conquests of the Mohammedans in three continents…. In particular, let us not forget India … where first Mohammedans and then Christians furiously and most cruelly attacked the followers of mankind’s sacred and original faith. The ever-deplorable, wanton, and ruthless destruction and disfigurement of ancient temples and images reveal to us even to this day traces of the monotheistic fury [my emphasis] of the Mohammedans which was pursued from Mahmud of Ghazni of accursed memory down to Aurangzeb the fratricide.”
Arthur Schopenhauer contrasts the peaceful historical record of the Hindus and the Buddhists with the wickedness and cruelty of the monotheists, and then concludes:
“Indeed, intolerance is essential only to monotheism; an only God is by nature a jealous God who will not allow another to live. On the other hand, polytheistic gods are naturally tolerant; they live and let live. In the first place, they gladly tolerate their colleagues, the gods of the same religion, and this tolerance is afterwards extended even to foreign gods who are accordingly, hospitably received and later admitted, in some cases, even to an equality of rights… Thus it is only the monotheistic religions that furnish us with the spectacle of religious wars, religious persecutions, courts for trying heretics, and also with that of iconoclasm, the destruction of the images of foreign gods, the demolition of Indian temples and Egyptian colossi that had looked at the sun for three thousand years; all this because their jealous God had said: “Thou shalt make no graven image” and so on.”
W A Palgrave vividly described the Koranic God as thus: “He is ever more prone to punish than to reward, to inflict pain than to bestow pleasure, to ruin than to build. It is His singular satisfaction to let created beings continually feel that they are nothing else than His slaves, His tools—and contemptible tools too—that they may thus the better acknowledge His superiority, and know His power to be above their power, His cunning above their cunning, His will above their will, His pride above their pride; or rather, that there is no power, cunning, will, or pride, save His own.”
In the ancient times, monotheism is blamed as the instigator of violence in its early days as it inspired the Israelites to wage war upon the Canaanites who believed in multiple gods. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, former President of India, regarded monotheism to be one reason of violence, said:
“The intolerance of narrow monotheism is written in letters of blood across the history of man from the time when first the tribes of Israel burst into the land of Canaan. The worshippers of the one jealous God are egged on to aggressive wars against people of alien cults. They invoke divine sanction for the cruelties inflicted on the conquered. The spirit of old Israel is inherited by Christianity and Islam, and it might not be unreasonable to suggest that it would have been better for Western civilization if Greece had molded it on this question rather than Palestine.” As compared to Abrahamic religions, religions of the east (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism,) have always believed in ‘Sarva Dharma Samabhava’ meaning literally that all Dharmas are equal to or harmonious with each other.
Muslim theologians are unanimous in declaring that no religious toleration was extended to the idolaters in the past and will not be in the future. The only choice given to them was death or the acceptance of Islam. Osama Bin Laden said that “what is false is false — even if a billion individuals agree to it; and truth is truth — even if only one who has submitted [a Muslim] holds on to it,” and also said that “Battle, animosity, and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion. And we consider this a justice and kindness to them” (The Al Qaeda Reader, pgs. 42-43).
Time to implement TWO NATION Theory or Declare Benign Dictatorship
It is time to discuss, debate and dialogue the consequences of appeasement policies toward Muslims, not adopting family planning, failure to stop the Bangladesh infiltration, not implementing the uniform civil code, inability to stop the relentless terror, ever increasing rampage of the Hindu villages, never ending insulting of Hindus, and determination to convert India into a Muslim Country. Hindus being silent, indifferent, tend to postpone the discussion and they are unable to publicly name the Muslims as the enemies of democracy, as terrorists, and as the traitors of India. After visiting India Tarek Fatah rightly observed,“As a Muslim, I found it fascinating that this is the only place in the world where Muslims exert influence without fear. Muslims are better equipped in India than in Pakistan and Bangladesh.” By avoiding an open discussion about the impending take-over of India by Muslims in less than a decade, Hindu politicians, Hindu organizations and the government are going to fulfill the long cherished dreams of Muslims to convert Hindu country into an Islamic State. It would not be too long to see the carnage of Hindus since they have no place to go. They will be shackled, cornered, tortured and killed. The only option left for Hindus would be convert to Islam to save their lives.
If we don’t act and take necessary steps to curtail the inflow of Bangladeshi Muslims into India, control the intentional breeding of the Muslims to outnumber the locals, and root out terrorist cells and their atrocities, Hindu lives will be in perennial danger. If Hindus fail to scrap all the appeasement policies toward Muslims, if they continue to ignore the statements of annihilating Hindus, if they do not take appropriate action against the Muslim leaders who openly pronounce the hateful speeches calling Hindus as weaklings, dummies, boneless, gutless, spineless, etc.; and if the government and Hindus abrogate their responsibility to protect the Hindus from being bullied, bruised, humiliated, raped, tortured, maimed, and killed, Hindu genocide is around the corner. There would not be any place for Hindus either to hide or run from the ruthless Islamic sword.
We Hindus must recognize that Islam and Hinduism are incompatible in their ideologies, values, practices, human rights, inclusiveness, women’s rights, tolerance toward each other, marriage customs, and democratic principles. Hindus must realize the gravity of the precarious situation the majority Hindus are facing in the hands of Muslim minorities who are using every means to create fear among Hindus and drive them from their villages. It should be pointed out that the in the very near future that the Hindus are going to be corned and another carnage of Hindus similar to the carnage during the Independence time, of not too far in the sight. It is a matter of years not decades. Muslims stayed back only to recapture India through violent means. Their loyalty is not to India but for global dominance and supremacy over all religions. They are in India not to integrate, not to accommodate, not to adjust and not to assimilate in the main stream of India but to dominate, subjugate, subdue, control and suppress Hindus through Islamic Justice which allows them to dispose of all Hindus at their will, reminiscent of Islamic brutal, barbaric and ruthless dominance of Hindu India for eight centuries. Islamization using the Sharia law is already taking place that undermines the human dignity and denies the human rights for non-Muslims.
Let us remember the resolution passed by the Council of the All-India Muslim League on June 6, 1946 to protect the lives of Muslims by breaking up India to create Pakistan. It says, “…the attainment of the goal of complete sovereign Pakistan still remains an unalterable objective of the Musalmans in India, for the achievement of which they would, if necessary, employ every means in their power and consider no sacrifice or suffering too great.”
Similarly, Jinnah insisted that the Muslims of India are a nation with a “distinctive culture and civilization, language and literature, art and architecture, law and moral codes, customs and calendar, history and traditions.”
Ambedkar foresaw a bleak and brutal future for India as long as Muslims remain in India. He unequivocally advocated the population exchange in case of partition. He wanted Hindus and Sikhs from Pakistan to come to India and all the Muslims from India to go to Pakistan. “That the transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace is beyond doubt…there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by Indians. After all, the population involved is inconsiderable and because some obstacles require to be removed, it would be the height of folly to give up so sure a way to communal peace… The only way to make Hindustan homogeneous is to arrange for exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan.”
“The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. … In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin,” said Ambedkar.
Rabindranath Tagore said that Muslims and Hindus can coexist as long as they accept the principle of ahimsa and the ideology of live and let live. Knowing the irreconcilable differences between these two religions, and the Muslims’ intention to dominate the world though the sword, he predicted in 1911, “The world-wide problem today is not how to unite by wiping out all differences, but how to unite with all the differences intact; a difficult task, for it permits of no trickery and calls for mutual give-and-take… The Muslims in our country are striving for advancement as a separate community. However disagreeable and disadvantage that may be for us for the time being, it is only right way to achieve genuine unity some day in the future.”
Annie Besant says, “The world has gone beyond such so-called theocracies, in which God’s commands are given through a man. The claim now put forward by Musalman leaders that they must obey the laws of their particular prophet above the laws of the State in which they live, is subversive of civic order and the stability of the State … Malabar has taught us what Islamic rule still means, and we do not want to see another specimen of the ‘Khilafat 5 Raj’ in India … there is no place in a civilized land for people who believe that their religion teaches them to murder, rob, rape, burn, or drive away out of the country those who refuse to apostatize from their ancestral faiths … Such ‘Laws of God’ cannot be allowed to override the laws of a civilized country … In fact, Muslim sects are not safe in a country ruled by orthodox Muslims.”
Hindus should wake up to the fact their lives are in grave danger. Muslims have been committing countless atrocities across the countries and waging war on Hindu infidels in India. Hindu leaders, politicians, liberals, intellectuals and media are not even recognizing the gravity of the potential threat to the country although the terrorist organizations and many Muslim leaders openlyadvocating the hostile takeover of India by Muslims. They have been openly declaring to make India a Muslim country. They are not hiding their intentions. Hindus are totally failing in their responsibility to recognize the potential holocaust and denying the most obvious threat for their survival. ISIS has already moved to India, flexes its forces by recruiting young men and also bringing terrorists from Pakistan to create panic by blowing up few buildings and killing several people on the way to establish Caliphate. Longer the Hindus wait, more agony they have to endure. Only two choices are left for Hindus to avoid their holocaust: 1) Implement the original two-nation theory developed during the time of Independence allowing all Muslims to go to Pakistan to create an Islamic country and all Hindus to India to establish Hindustan. Theoretically it may make more sense to protect the lives of Hindus, it is almost impractical to implement at present considering the number of Muslims living in India and increasing day by day. 2) Second option is to establish a benign dictatorship for a period of ten years with a mission to enforce uniform civil code, remove all the minority privileges, dismantle all minority departments, eliminate all quota systems, stop illegal infiltration from Bangladesh, prosecute those who demean the country, pass anti-conversion laws, declare cow as the animal of the country, introduce Sanskrit as national language, assure equal rights to Hindus to manage their Hindu Temples, and revise the school curriculum to teach the morals and ethics that have sustained the greatness of Sanatana Dharma for millennia. Revise the Indian Constitution by removing all the privileges accorded to any given religion.
India must be made Hindustan as was planned during the Independence and as was envisioned by Jinnah who said, “Hindu and Muslim cultures constitute two distinct, and frequently antagonistic, ways of life, and that therefore they cannot coexist in one nation.” Let very body remember what was discussed at the time of Independence and implement, although it is late by 68 years. “At the time of partition some of the two-nation theory protagonists proposed that the entire Hindu population should migrate to India and all Muslims should move over to Pakistan, leaving no Hindus in Pakistan and no Muslims in India …”(S. Harmon).
There is no question that Muslims want India to be converted into Islamic Country. It is their “unfinished business.” Indian Muslims are dreaming and planning break up India into three Islamic countries – Mughalistan, Dravidistan and Dalitisthan. Asaduddin Owasi has publicly announced that he would not call India as Bharat Mata. He said he would wipe out all Hindus in fifteen minutes if police force is withdrawn. Gulab Nabi Azad equated ISIS with RSS. He refused to apologize for saying. ISIS has already announced that it will take over India and make it an Islamic Country. The writing is on the wall. Hindus have not read the writings on the wall, have not recognized the threat, have not challenged the Muslims for their anti-Hindu statements and are refusing the acknowledge the potential threat. Hindu holocaust is around the corner. Hindus must face it otherwise they will be finished.
Hindus have experienced the Islamic atrocities for nearly ten centuries. If they have not learned from the history of Islamic invasions, and brutality inflicted on our forefathers, we are likely to experience the same fate as our ancestors. It is the dharma of every Hindu to preserve and protect the Hindu lives for the sake of our future generations, for the sake of the freedom we have been enjoying, and for the sake of humanity. Let us not allow this freedom slip away from our fingers.
All across the globe, scholars and philosophers have been writing about the barbarism, bloodthirstiness, savagery, and viciousness of Islam. As far back as 1921, Andre Servierelaborated the nature of Islam: “Islam was not a torch, as has been claimed, but an extinguisher. Conceived in a barbarous brain for the use of a barbarous people, it was—and it remains—incapable of adapting itself to civilization. Wherever it has dominated, it has broken the impulse towards progress and checked the evolution of society.” (P; 153)
Sri Aurobindo predicated way back in 1909 that, “Every action for instance which may be objectionable to a number of Mahomedans is now liable to be forbidden because itis likely to lead to a breach of the peace, and one is dimly beginning to’ wonder whether the day may not come when worship in Hindu temples may be forbidden on that valid ground.” Indeed, Sri Aurobindo predictive statement need to be heeded as soon as possible. Many Hindu Temples across India are not allowed to do worship services, sing bhajans, chant mantras, ring bells, install pendals, and endure the loud speakers announcing the greatness of Allah.
Let us remember the words of Anne Besant and allow them to inspire every Hindu to champion the cause of Hindutva. “After a study of some forty years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so perfect, none so scientific, none so philosophic, and none so spiritual as the great religion known by the name of Hinduism. The more you know it, the more you will love it; the more you try to understand it, the more deeply you will value it. Make no mistake; without Hinduism, India has no future. Hinduism is the soil into which India’s roots are struck, and torn of that she will inevitably wither, as a tree torn out from its place… And if Hindus do not maintain Hinduism, who shall save it? If India’s own children do not cling to her faith, who shall guard it? India alone can save India, and India and Hinduism are one.” Jai Hind