[GHHF] Two-Nation Theory Implementation or Benign Dictatorship Needed Stop the Potential Hindu Genocide
The only way to make Hindustan homogeneous is to arrange for exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan.” B R Ambedkar
“There is no other way but to divide India. Give Muslims their homeland and give Hindus Hindustan.” Mohammad Ali Jinnah
If Bharath has to protect it’s Hindu population, preserve it’s territorial integrity, and stop the impending Hindu holocaust, India has to wake up fast. Hindus have to speak out first. Based on the two-nation theory, Muslims should be sent back to Pakistan or Bangladesh if we want to prevent Hindu holocaust in the hands of Muslims in and if we want to keep India as Hindustan as was planned at the time of separation. Partition took place only on the basis of the vision of having one Muslim Country and the other a Hindu nation. It is the ideology of Muslims to dominate the whole world into Islamic countries through their sword prompted us to revisit this theory. People in India would soon have to decide either to be killed or to be converted. We will soon witness a blood bath that might pale the genocide of Hindus during partition. Once this rampage starts there is no place for Hindus either to hide or flee.
It is time for every Hindu to read the history of India for the last ten centuries and how the Muslims have ruled India and how they had tortured our forefathers, raped our sisters, ransacked our shops, ambushed the villages, maimed our bodies, slit our throats, and dumped the bodies in the gutters. More than 2000 Hindu Temples were destroyed and converted them into mosques. Many of our revered Deities were broken into pieces only to be used as footsteps for their mosques.
Any indifference, negligence, silence on the part of Indian government and Hindus will be taken as sign of welcoming Muslims for more bloodshed, and more destruction. Untold misery and indescribable agony is awaiting Hindus. Hindus are the only ones scared of Muslims and unable to say it openly for fear of being attacked and killed. Hindu Politicians, for fear of losing their block of votes, would dare not talk about it.
How do stop the upcoming Hindu Genocide in India.
Continuation of appeasement of Muslims, our utter failure to name the Islam as the enemy of the humanity, our inability to quell the rising terrorism, our intentional overlooking of the verses in Quran which advocated the killing of nonbelievers, failure to recognize the Islamic intention of breaking India into three Muslim countries, incapability to enforce the law to stop the incessant atrocities committed against Hindus, and our powerlessness to enforce uniform civil code, are only few examples that will inspire Muslims to commit heinous crime on the Hindu lives. If we have to stop the upcoming Hindu genocide, there are only two solutions:
- Revisit and implement the Two-Nation Theory that was the basis for partition where all the Muslims were to Pakistan while all Hindus and Sikhs were to go to India. In spite of all the arguments against the implementation being impossible, the potential total decimation of Hindu population in India should convince the leadership to save the lives of Hindus. Once the carnage starts happening, nobody can stop it. Hindus have no nation to turn to escape from the bloodbath. Muslims have Pakistan and Bangladesh to go to as was originally planned during the Independence time. Further Muslims have about 58 Islamic counties to turn for their shelter. or
- Benign DICTATORSHIP should be the second solution to avert the mass killings of Hindus in the near future. A strong leader with courage and fearlessness, should make sure that all the citizens are given equal opportunities, all special privileges based on religion are removed, family planning is implemented, uniform civil code is enforced, and territorial integrity is restored.
These solutions may seem preposterous, outrageous, abrasive, inhuman, notorious, despicable and intolerant to certain sections of the population. Similar opinions were expressed when two nation theory was being discussed. India was partitioned to make sure that all Muslims will live in Islamic country, Pakistan and all Hindus live in Hindustan, India. Since Independence, Hindu population in Pakistan dwindled to almost nil from about 18 percent in Pakistan and about 6 percent from about 24 percent in Bangladesh. In short periods of time, Persia was changed to Iran by driving all the Zoroastrians, Afghanistan drove out all Buddhists to make it an Islamic Country, and once Christian dominated Lebanon changed to Islamic country. In India, nearly 500,000 Kashmiri Pandits were thrown out mercilessly by Muslim majority, and in West Bengal Illegal infiltration and local Muslims are rampaging the villages and conducting numerous terrorist activities. At present, there are about 35 percent Muslims in Assam, 28 percent in Kerala, 20 percent in UP, 96 percent in Lakshadweep, and nearly 50 percent in Hyderabad alone. The more we wait, greater the chance of unimaginable
Lessons from Partition: Hindus and Muslim Cannot Live Together
The whole premise for the partition of India into two countries is based on two arguments:
- Hindus and Muslims cannot live together
- Need a Separate Islamic Country to live according to the teachings of Quran
A number of years before the Independence, many Muslim leaders had argued that Hindus and Muslims cannot live together because of their differences in their religious beliefs. In his presidential address to the Muslim League at Lahore in 1940, Jinnah declared: “Islam and Hinduism are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but in fact different and distinct social orders, and it is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality…. To yoke together two such nations under a single state … must lead to a growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state.” He argues that these two religions have different ethics, values, morals, worship methods, festivals, food habits, marriage systems, and allegiances to the God.
On March 22-23, 1940 Jinnah stated that “The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures. They neither intermarry nor inter-dine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.”
The two religions are different as two belief systems and ideology. Islam is monotheistic, proselytizing, anti-idolatrous, fiercely doctrinal, aggressive, anti-secular, with strong ideas about heresy. Hinduism is pantheistic, pluralistic, non-violent, uninterested in converting other faiths, and rooted in the belief of Vigraha worship. They also believe in worship of multiple gods, expression of openness as seen in Khajuraho, different worship services, self-improvement, spirituality and yoga and meditation. Never interested in rooting out other religions, invading other countries because of their religious believes and submitting them to their way of life.
Hinduism does not believe that it has all the answers and does not call non-believers in Hinduism as kafirs or scums. Islam not only believes that those who do not accept Islam are ‘kafirs’, it also believes that it is Allah’s wish that non-Islamic lands be treated as battlefields on which holy wars must be fought. Muslims believe that the whole world must be made Islamic, darul Islam. In order to make it happen, Muslims carry out proselyting, terrorism, killings, don’t allow Muslim girls to marry non-Muslims, produce more kids, declare jihad against non-Muslim countries, relying on Quran for justification. B R Ambedkar asserted that, “The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity” (Pakistan or Partition of India).
President Dr. Abdul Kalam said: “In 3000 years of our history, people from all over the world have come and invaded us, captured our lands conquered our minds. From Alexander onwards, the Greeks, the Portuguese, the Mughals, the British, the French, the Dutch, all of them came and looted us, took over what was ours. Yet we have not done this to any other nation. We have not conquered anyone. We have not grabbed their land, their culture, their history and tried to enforce our way of life on them. Why? Because we respect the freedom of others.”
Demand for Islamic State
In hindsight anyone acquainted with the partition of India would agree that the struggle for separate Pakistan was solely based on religious terms. In August 1941, Muhammad Al Jinnah said while describing the distinctive feature of the Islamic state that “there is a special feature of the Islamic state which must not be overlooked. There, obedience is due to God and God alone, which takes practical shape in the observance of the Quranic principles and commands. In Islam, obedience is due neither to a king, nor to a parliament, nor to any other organization. It is the Quranic provisions which determine the limits of our freedom and restrictions in political and social spheres. In other words, the Islamic state is an agency for enforcement of the Quranic principles and injunctions”.
He also stated, “There is no other way but to divide India. Give Muslims their homeland and give Hindus Hindustan.” Although the idea of creating a separate Pakistan was put forth by Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan, Mohamud Iqbal, Choudhary Rahmat Ali and others from 1930’s, it was solidified by Muhammad Ali Jinnah who vehemently insisted on breaking India on religious lines.
Iqbal explained to Jinnah his vision of a separate Muslim state in a letter sent on 21 June 1937:
“A separate federation of Muslim Provinces, reformed on the lines I have suggested above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the domination of Non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations in India and outside India are.”
In 1939, a Hyderabad-born Abul Ala Maududi wrote in Jihad in the Way of Allah, that Islam wasn’t a “hotchpotch of beliefs, prayers and rituals”. Instead, it was “a revolutionary ideology which seeks to alter the social order of the entire world and rebuild it in conformity with its own (Islamic) tenets”. He concluded “if the Muslim Party commands enough resources, it will eliminate un-Islamic governments and establish the power of Islamic government in their place.”
The Indian wing of the Jama’at-e-Islami asserts that all men “should refuse to acknowledge as valid all those allegiances which are not subservient to the allegiance of the One Allah and His Law”—presumably including the Indian state republic.
In an interview with journalist Beverley Nichols, Jinnah said, “In all these things, our outlook is not only fundamentally different but also opposed to Hindus. There is nothing in life that links us together. Our names, clothes, food, festivals, and rituals, all are different. Our economic life, our educational ideas, treatment of women, attitude towards animals, and humanitarian considerations, all are very different.”
Because of Jinnah’s insistence and relentless argument for the separation of India into two nations, and his desire to be the Prime Minister, Sardar Patel realized there would be more tortures and more bloodshed flooding the Indian soil if separation is not granted. By early 1947, Patel started justifying the partition by saying, “In this way alone could we end the quarrel between Hindus and Muslims … if two brothers cannot stay together, they divide. After their separation, with their respective shares, they become friends. If, on the other hand, they are forced to stay together they tend to fight every day.”
“Pakistan was founded because the Muslims of the subcontinent wanted to build up their lives in accordance with the teachings and traditions of Islam, because they wanted to demonstrate to the world that Islam provides a panacea to the many diseases which have crept into the life of humanity today.’ Liaquat Ali Khan
Since there was a popular demand from all the religious leaders to change the Constitution to reflect the Islamization of Pakistan, the following Article 2A in inserted in the Constitution: “The Muslims shall be enable to order their lives in their individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings and requirements of Islam.” The Constitution of Pakistan, part IX, article 227 says “All existing laws shall be brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Quran and Sunnah, in this Part referred to as the Injunctions of Islam, and no law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such Injunctions”.
All across the globe, Muslims have been openly declaring death to the countries they live in and also announce that Islam will dominate, implement sharia law, and kneel the other religious people to Allah. Few minutes of watching TV these days one cannot escape looking at the signs and banners by hundreds and thousands of Muslims such as “freedom can go to hell”, “Islam will dominate the world”, and “Shariah law – the true solution”, “death to democracy”, “Islam is coming to Denmark”, “Islam is coming to America”, “Behead those who insult Islam”, as well as many other similar tag lines. They do not respect the majority views and take advantage of freedom of speech to over through the country that hosted them.
In Washington, DC, there is a group known as As-Sabiqun, and its leader is Imam Abdul Alim Musa.
Its plans and goals are those of most Muslims across the globe. Their goal is to see that the Islam will be able to control all human beings on Earth. Their mission is to make everybody submit to Islam, true to its real meaning. They passed some resolutions reflecting their commitment to dominate the world:
“We resolve to shape the ideas, beliefs, and moral viewpoints of the people into an Islamic mold. Toward this end we will, insha’Allah, develop the comprehensive educational system that is necessary to inform, inspire, and direct the society toward Islamic revolution (or evolution).”
“We resolve to utilize all the tools of Islam to develop an analysis and plan of action to totally and completely obliterate the hold of jahiliyyah and enable Islam to take complete control of our lives,
and ultimately, the lives of all human beings on Earth.”
As late as January 31, 2016 Tamil Nadu Thowheed Jamath (TNTJ) vowed to end Idol worship and Hindu practices and all others which are not according to ‘real Islam’. ISIS like organizations are sprouting all across the country. Ant-Shirk Conference declared that it is sin to worship idols and they should be destroyed. All the speakers pledged to enforce Sharia law across India. They said they will use three weapons to destroy Hinduism: Shirk, Sharia and Jihad. Since the idol worship is against Islam, they said it should be banned. They even posted many banners criticizing Idol worship near many Hindu Temples. Nobody was charged with creating disharmony in the community. Kamlesh Tiwari was arrested for saying Allah was homosexual. However, no action is taken against Muslim speakers who are criticizing Hindu practices of worship. Hindu days are numbered. It is a matter of a decade or less before Islam start destroying the Temples, rampaging the Villages, raping the women, torturing Hindus and start forcing Hindus to convert to Islam or start killing Hindus.
So called intellectuals, artists, scientists, communists, secularists and cine artists have no comments and willfully hiding from the scene to criticize this Anti Shirk Conference. Media will not talk about the growing threat to Bharath. All these are bought of Islamic Countries who may have paid them to shut their mouths.
In Islam, shirk (Arabic term) is the sin of practicing idolatry or polytheism, i.e. the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God i.e. Allah. Literally, it means ascribing or the establishment of “partners” placed beside God. It is the vice that is opposed to the virtue of Tawhid (monotheism).
Sharia or Islamic Law
Sharia, Islamic sharia or Islamic law is the basic Islamic legal system derived its authority from the Islamic teachings of the Quran and the Hadith. The term sharia is an Arabic term to mean a body of moral and religious laws consistent with Islamic scriptures that may be opposed to human rights. Sharia law is antithetical to the prevailing legal system and against the individual rights. If the Muslims are able to institute Sharia in India, the modern secular democracy we have known for years will be vanished from Bharath. Every aspect of life is molded, guided, and dictated as per Islamic law that was adopted in Pakistan.
Sharia deals with many topics, including crime, politics, marriage contracts, clothing, religious prescriptions, sports, amusements and banking, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting. Adherence to sharia has served as one of the distinguishing characteristics of the Muslim faith historically. In its strictest definition, sharia is considered in Islam as the infallible law of Allah an it cannot be questioned.
Sharia is considered the law of Allah to mean that it is the best to be followed across the globe. Consequently, Muslims who believe firmly, fanatically and devoutly, are in constant struggle(jihad) with the people of the country and in continuous battle with their ruling government to establish Islamic Sharia. Islamic law has certainly aimed at “controlling the religious, social and political life of mankind in all its aspects, the life of its followers without qualification, and the life of those who follow tolerated religions to a degree that prevents their activities from hampering Islam in any way.” 345
The all-embracing nature of Islamic law can be seen from the fact that it does not distinguish among ritual, law (in the European sense of the word), ethics, and good manners. In principle this legislation controls the entire life of the believer and the Islamic community. It intrudes into every nook and cranny: everything—to give a random sample—from the pilgrim tax, agricultural contracts, the board and lodging of slaves, the invitation to a wedding, the use of toothpicks, the ritual fashion in which one’s natural needs are to be accomplished, the prohibition for men to wear gold or silver rings, to the proper treatment of animals is covered.”
Ibn Warraq (Why I am Not a Muslim)” described the unworthy principles as thus: intolerance of pagans, the call to violence and murder, the lack of equality for women and non-Muslims, the acceptance of slavery, barbaric punishments, and the contempt for human reason.
According to The Week, in Saudi Arabia (ironically, the head of the United Nations Human Rights Council), women cannot go anywhere without a chaperone, drive a car, “wear clothes or make-up that show off their beauty,” interact with men they’re not related to and many other oddities.
Crimes that are punishable by death in Saudi Arabia (often by public beheading or stoning), according to Vocativ, include adultery, “consensual gay sex with an adult,” robbery, drug distribution and possession, apostasy, consumption of intoxicants, sorcery and witchcraft. You can also be executed for being gay and being an atheist.
According to a poll done by Pew Research Center in 2013, which asked Muslims of various countries (such as Albania, Russia, Bosnia, Kyrgyzstan, Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Palestine, Egypt, Jordan and others) about the penalty for apostasy, a large number of them supported the death penalty. In Egypt, 86 percent supported killing apostates.
Some examples of Sharia LAW:
Once Muslims have the power and make laws based on Quran and Hadiths, All Hindus will have to follow these rules, failing which can result in severe punishments and deaths. More than that all Hindus would lose their freedom to express because that would be incompatible with Islamic Jurisprudence. It would have drastic effect on the whole of Bharath and the generations to come.
- Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand
- Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
- Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
- A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
- A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
- A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
- A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
- Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad‘s words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
- A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
- A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
- A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
- Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
- A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
- A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.
- A woman inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
- A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
- A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
- Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be Halal.
- Muslims should engage in Taqiyyaand lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim
- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body, which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ.
- All the Hindu Temples could be demolished since they are against “idolaters.”
- Taharush is the Arab word that denotes the encircling of girls and women by groups of Muslim men for the purpose of sexual harassment, including assaults, groping and even rapes. The seizure of Infidel females and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Koran.
Once the Muslims dominate the political structure in India, they can pass the Sharia law and all Hindus can be subjected to the above commands of Islam.
A number cases across India are reported about the extent of Love Jihad, Sex Jihad, Snake Jihad and simple Jihad itself targeting Hindu girls. Balbir Punj’s investigative report revealed that there are “Several instances of young Muslim boys enticing Hindu and Christian girls in Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra and several other parts of the country with the show of wealth and promises of marriage and then, ferrying them to Kashmir and other places, converting them and recruiting them forcibly into Islamist Jihad came to light, concerns at this Love Jihad were raised.” Many of the Muslim boys change their identity and assume the Hindu names to trap the innocent girls, marry the, and sell them to other Arb countries. Even the Muslim girls conceal their identity as non-Muslims trapping gullible men into Islamic ideology and recruit them for ISIS.
Sex Jihad is being operated at two levels. Based on the stories we heard from reliable sources that the Muslim boys will be watching few families to sense some kind of discord in the young families and approach the young wives to help them emotionally and financially. The Muslim boys are urged to be tactful and clever in enticing these young marries women, offer any amount of money, exploit them sexually and blackmail them with pictures taken hideously. At another level, several girls from different counties offer themselves for Islamists fighting in Syria. ISIS maintained sex jihad cells in the area where the women cannot escape and each girl served as many as 30-40 soldiers a day. These soldiers conducted sex jihad spree wherever they went and raped as many women as they want in their houses.
Hindus should recognize that the hadith Al Bukahri stated that Muslims have the right to kill non-Muslims if they do not submit to Allah. They have the right to take over or destroy the property, siege the towns, massacre men, rape women, and enslave children. “Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally.” (Bukhari 8.387)
Jihad is broadly defined to mean an offensive war waged against the non-Muslims to convert them to Islam or kill them if they fail to embrace Islam, mainly to establish Islamic Nation. Sayyid Abu Ala Maududi’, in his book Al Jihad fil-lslam (“Jihad in Islam”), says that Muslims believe in Jihad because “Islam is all-encompassing, the Islamic state was for all the world and should not be limited to just the homeland of Islam”.
In no uncertain terms Islam has been planning to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam, regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The goal of Islam is to set up a State which will be run by the Quranic principles and it should obey the injunctions of Allah. No individual freedom of judgement is allowed in a n Islamic State. Jihad should be used to press into action all forces at their disposal to eliminate and non-Islamic nations and establish Islamic State.
Maududi taught that the destruction of the lives and property of others was lamentable (part of the great sacrifice of jihad), but that Muslims must follow the Islamic principle that it is better to “suffer a lesser loss to save ourselves from a greater loss”. Though in jihad “thousands” of lives may be lost, this cannot compare “to the calamity that may befall mankind as a result of the victory of evil over good and of aggressive atheism over the religion of God.”
Jihad is the major tool the Muslims use to dominate the world through terror, torture and death. It is the religious duty of all Muslims who are commanded to wage a holy war against infidels. Some of the Muslim leaders claim that Jihad is mainly a spiritual struggle to mislead the people, an examination of the commandments of Koran give a horrendous picture. Sura 9:29 commands the Muslims to “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
Since 9/11 there have been an estimated 27, 704 deadly Muslim terrorist attacks across the globe. In India alone there are more than 40 terrorist attacks on Hindus killing and injuring a many Hindus. The objective of these Jihadi philosophy is not only to convert Hindus into Islam but most importantly to control the political sphere of India and try to enforce sharia law. With the help of media and the so called Hindu liberals, intellectuals and secularists abetting the process to establish more and more terrorist cells and ISIS operations. Tufail Ahmad observed that they routinely advise the government in foreign policies. “Many journalists based in Delhi are also on the payroll of the Pakistani Military’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which creates and nurtures terrorist groups.” Their loyalties are mortgaged with the enemy of the country where the make a living.
All Hindus should be aware of the number of fatwas being rendered by Ulemas (Islamic scholars) that would punitive effect on the lives of Muslims. Once they reach a certain percentage either in a given state or India, they can also force all Hindus to abide by these fatwas which have serious consequences for their lives and the freedom they are enjoying at present. Overwhelming decimation of Hindus may not be an exaggeration.
Fatwa is defined as a legal opinion or a decree issued by Islamic Scholars on a specific topic. Any Muslim can seek an opinion from Ulemas from an Islamic point view on any given topic and get directive for them to follow. The range of fatwas issued include death sentence to food, medicine, dress code, marital issues, divorce, entertainment, music, and host of other topics. Some of these fatwas are serious which may lead to killing of the individuals while others may not be enforceable.
Let us look at some of the fatwas issued that may have lasting impact on Muslims as well as Hindus. Fatwas are rendered against Solomon Rushdie’s life for penning The Satanic verses considered insulting to Islam; Taslima Nasreen’s life for writing a book Lajja considered un-Islamic; Surya Namaskar since it is against Islam to worship other than Allah; Vandemataram as some of the verses are considered against the tenets of Islam; noodles and ketchup for allegedly containing pig fat; actress Veena Malik for objectionable photos; firecrackers for misuse of money;Madhubala book by Harivansh Rai Bachchan for hurting Muslim sentiments; birthday celebrations because they are of western culture; professional models for being un-Islamic custom; Aroopa Alam the female journalist for going alone to interview ex-Chief Minister without being accompanied by a male relative; grown up girls for riding bicycles as it bound to result in undue exposure; Shah Rukh Khan who was expelled from Islam for insulting his faith; A R Rahman for providing music to the movie on Muhammad: Messenger of God; and many other similar topics.
The primary motive for one-third of Muslim population to stay back in India is establish Islamic State either by waging war against Hindu infidels, threatening the political leaders or demanding special privileged to dominate the political structure to establish Islamic rule in India. On July 13, 2011 a group known as Darul Ulloom Deobad issued Fatwa in Nagpur on Hindus living in Muslim-majority areas demanding that they should either accept Islam or pay 10 percent of their income as ‘Jizya.’ If they do not obey the Fatwa, Hindus should be prepared to fight. It is further stated that, “This country does not belong to Hindus now and it never belonged to Hindus. This country was ruled by Muslims for so many years … that the areas where Muslims are in majority, the governance should be by Muslims as per ‘Shariat’ law.” Hindus are in a precarious situation and they are ignoring it as if nothing is happening. They are becoming immune to the atrocities, fatwas and slow implementation of Sharia law in Bharath.
Part II of this article will be published in few days